From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 22 12:20:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFE91065673 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org) Received: from unimail.uni-dortmund.de (mx1.HRZ.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.128.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4408FC1A for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (p4FE323AF.dip.t-dialin.net [79.227.35.175]) (authenticated bits=0) by unimail.uni-dortmund.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7MC3J0n012235 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:03:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C711207.5090608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:03:19 +0200 From: Matthias Andree Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Mnenhy/0.8.2 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org References: <4C6505A4.9060203@FreeBSD.org> <4C650B75.3020800@FreeBSD.org> <4C651192.9020403@FreeBSD.org> <4C673898.2080609@FreeBSD.org> <20100818134341.GA88861@johnny.reilly.home> <86r5htdqmu.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86wrriki4g.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86wrriki4g.fsf@ds4.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Interpreted language(s) in the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:20:21 -0000 Am 22.08.2010 13:21, schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav: > Gabor PALI writes: >> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes: >>> Gabor PALI writes: >>>> Sorry for chiming in, just a quick idea. If you find the "get a >>>> high-level language that compiled to C" idea good, >>> I don't think it's a good idea >> Could you be more specific on your concerns? I am just curious. > > If we want compiled code, we already have C and C++. What we need is an > interpreted language with good libraries so people can write scripts and > one-liners without having to jump through too many hoops and worry about > quoting. The result may not be as fast as a compiled program, but it > will be much faster than a shell script and take less time to write than > either C or shell. Looks a bit like a swing. First we remove Perl from the base system (years ago) and move to sed/awk, now we discuss using a scripting language in the base system...