Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:49:41 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: List of things to move from main tree to ports Message-ID: <20010216114941.F90210@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <200102161741.f1GHf0A97803@earth.backplane.com>; from dillon@earth.backplane.com on Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 09:41:00AM -0800 References: <200102161508.f1GF8DR28339@cwsys.cwsent.com> <200102161741.f1GHf0A97803@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[cc: list mercifully killed] On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 09:41:00AM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote: > in regards to Kerberos IV. Nobody in their right mind should be > using it any more That's perhaps a bit harsh -- there are still some environments in which Kerberos IV is useful/required (e.g. AFS, DCE). > so it should definitely become a port. But I agree with this sentiment. > The more controversial ones: > > * rdist > * rmt > * rcp, rlogin, rsh As long as these can be used with encryption, they should stay. > Extremely controversial: > > * telnet (i.e. its too useful to have around for other purposes) Agreed. This is my primary means of remote access (well, with Kerberos). -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010216114941.F90210>