Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:09:54 +0100
From:      Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        Takeshi Taguchi <taguchi@ff.iij4u.or.jp>
Subject:   Re: [patch] databases/db42 clang -fPIC issue
Message-ID:  <50A57642.3080504@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <50A4D79E.8090906@ff.iij4u.or.jp>
References:  <50A4D79E.8090906@ff.iij4u.or.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(List post, with a courtesy copy to Takeshi.)

Am 15.11.2012 12:53, schrieb Takeshi Taguchi:
> Hi,
> In CURRENT, clang can not compile database/db42.
> here is a error message:

Hi Takeshi,

I am the maintainer of said port, and I can confirm that your bug report
is in the database, but the web interface is currently not being
updated.  Sorry for that.

Also sorry for the build issues the port gave you on 10-CURRENT.


However, I cannot reproduce the problem on FreeBSD 9 amd64 with clang,
and I also have other reports on <http://pastebin.ca/2251922>; that the
build succeeds on a recent 10-CURRENT, and that -fPIC remains inside the
build arguments on clang++ command lines.  Said FreeBSD system was at
SVN revision r242852, built on amd64 with a GENERIC kernel on Nov 10.

Can you try to figure out the differences in the build logs, and
possibly update your world and retry?

How exactly have you configured your system to use clang(++)?
Is there anything in /etc/make.conf or /etc/src.conf?

Can you send me your config.log file OFF-LIST (send directly to my
address), from .../databases/db42/work/db-4.2.52/build_unix/ ?
(This is $WRKSRC/config.log, try:  make -V WRKSRC -C /usr/ports/*/db42
to obtain the WRKSRC path.)


Reviewing your patch, the replacement could be improved to use
${LIBTOOL} rather than something you have derived from $prefix;
furthermore, we use $prefix for a package we are about to install, and
$localbase for packages that we expect to already be installed (like
dependencies).


I need to understand better why we would need to patch things, before I
go into that.  We may need to patch something else, elsewhere (because
it needs to be more generic than for just the db42 port).

Thank you and best regards
Matthias Andree



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50A57642.3080504>