From owner-freebsd-security Sat Nov 4 14:33:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from citusc17.usc.edu (citusc17.usc.edu [128.125.38.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687AB37B4CF for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 14:33:41 -0800 (PST) Received: (from kris@localhost) by citusc17.usc.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eA4MZPh09028; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 14:35:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 14:35:25 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: **1st Vamp** Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pine 4.30 improvements Message-ID: <20001104143525.A9010@citusc17.usc.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from wes@pmason.karoo.co.uk on Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 08:59:37PM -0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 08:59:37PM -0000, **1st Vamp** wrote: > Not quite OT, but related, I was wondering if anyone had any info on the > security of the Nano port? Well, it's just a simple editor..presumably there's not too much that can go wrong with it. :-) Kris --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjoEjy0ACgkQWry0BWjoQKXOMQCfabmkc20zCDtaEXGfOhppqtMJ 9rsAoJB/iY3FZERpsKc3yyLGiSC4I+uR =GjWY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message