From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Nov 14 04:29:43 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B00F1108C70 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:29:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bluestop.org) Received: from muon.bluestop.org (muon.bluestop.org [96.73.9.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D019B8C3DC; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:29:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bluestop.org) Received: from muon.bluestop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.bluestop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9CFCDF95; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:30:22 -0700 (MST) Received: from muon.bluestop.org ([127.0.0.1]) by muon.bluestop.org (muon.bluestop.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fK2PmX9nUqIE; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:30:22 -0700 (MST) Received: from photon.int.bluestop.org (gw.bluestop.org [96.73.9.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.bluestop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:30:22 -0700 (MST) From: Rebecca Cran To: cem@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: No amdtemp sysctls, acpi errors, AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 21:29:38 -0700 Message-ID: <2418724.ffieBuXMo3@photon.int.bluestop.org> In-Reply-To: References: <2898686.bT80LyP3VS@photon.int.bluestop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D019B8C3DC X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.54 / 200.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bluestop.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bluestop.org:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[bluestop.org,quarantine]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mail.bluestop.org]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.931,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:96.64.0.0/11, country:US]; IP_SCORE(-3.10)[ip: (-9.77), ipnet: 96.64.0.0/11(-4.86), asn: 7922(-0.76), country: US(-0.10)] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:29:43 -0000 On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 21:17:59 MST Conrad Meyer wrote: > Maybe it should be -54 instead of +54? 183-(54*2) is the somewhat > plausible 75?C (still pretty warm even for load). How good is your > cooling solution? D'oh, of course it's -54 instead of +54 (For some reason I presumed a positive offset would be *subtracted*)! I have an all-in-one liquid thermaltake cooler installed, and under Windows it reports reaching 67C when running flat out, which doesn't seem bad. > (The references I can find with a quick search suggest TR 29xx should > also be -27? rather than -54?C, but they may be mistaken. 183-54-27 > is still 102?C ? extremely hot!) That's why I thought 54 was more likely! My 2990WX has 4 units for 32 cores instead of 2 units and 16 cores for other models, so I guessed that perhaps I should double the 27 value other people had said should be used. -- Rebecca