From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 25 6:55:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F3B37B422; Fri, 25 May 2001 06:55:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4PDujB40310; Fri, 25 May 2001 09:56:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Message-Id: <200105251356.f4PDujB40310@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:56:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin Subject: amd feature request (Re: AMD config file question.) To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, Jim.Pirzyk@disney.com, current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20010525023340.B54585@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Now that smbfs is in, can amd be used to mount smb shares? Of course, it can. But can we have something like "host" type, where all smb-shares available from a host are automaticly accessible? This may be added to the host-type together with NFS, or be made part of a separate smbhost type. I'd vote for the first one, personally... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message