From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Mon Sep 16 00:36:45 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6864AED271; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com [209.85.166.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46WnP920V2z3QGP; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id r26so74649591ioh.8; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:36:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=re6LHFQDMlTUnSirnF1PaeXdZMPt5ZQJ2vC7hiiqHik=; b=qS9V7EZnuVXJ1DTIt77OrhDuGk0fkAaGKuNgkxsB+npc0tLtxl1jnwSUqji+9gS3ov iah3LtrYxrVKNb9czs7DNx1/nPLXH5xXfj/+k3nddKqKUz5YpfbjUOsIZ/xwMwPFZxx4 +t2zPHD+jox7jZepcw1ZW3K0VfC0vlDT9nR1d0E+VMSbZuso4IFmPOozozb3+TXC9XRn UzY/H7Myj9zEVctgmmfJCjJQ8yG3PbUNDwBJhxdyU1XVpL60ikd3vHLmnzFLQYbjHUNj 0OJ3zOZY0il4Hcu/ZyIYLFKsyQJN6yWJ5IlIlakcdDPzmpnt6kON/A9r6LEIS1ekaNl5 VbBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXilyu69st1Hws5RaK4f2TbyrvETPqhqjm1dlvLd1wQcR1TZF/J Hl9RJoiYWSpsAILoY1wsewxIofnE X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzUoS4GYIAhE+lHD0uNUH4Z2c4m7yD0FM5I0N0F8FJHxxle7DE315l2FytFUMbC2JoSrgsLzA== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:f40f:: with SMTP id i15mr3148740iog.244.1568594203467; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-f45.google.com (mail-io1-f45.google.com. [209.85.166.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11sm31731372ioi.88.2019.09.15.17.36.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f45.google.com with SMTP id b136so74866491iof.3; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:36:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a02:8502:: with SMTP id g2mr17879917jai.87.1568594202946; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:36:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201909141923.x8EJNkVx049506@repo.freebsd.org> <20190915195122.GA60633@v2> In-Reply-To: <20190915195122.GA60633@v2> Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:36:32 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r352337 - in head: share/man/man3 sys/sys tests/sys/sys To: Edward Tomasz Napierala Cc: src-committers , svn-src-all , svn-src-head Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46WnP920V2z3QGP X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:36:45 -0000 On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 12:51 PM Edward Tomasz Napierala wrote: > On 0914T1532, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 12:23 PM Edward Tomasz Napierala > > wrote: > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352337 > > > > > > Log: > > > Introduce arb(3), the Array-based Red-Black Tree macros: similar > > > to the traditional tree(3) RB trees, but using an array (preallocated, > > > linear chunk of memory) to store the tree. > > > ... > > > > > > Reviewed by: bcr (man pages), markj > > > Discussed with: cem > > > ... > > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20324 > > > > This should read: "Objected to by: cem" > > Sorry, I misunderstood your last comment as withdrawing your objection, > my mistake. The comment that starts with "I'm still skeptical?" "Less objectionable" doesn't mean "not objectionable." Maybe I could have been more explicit, sorry for the confusion. Conrad