From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 10 21:32:35 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA25137 for current-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 21:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heli-fishing.eos.ncsu.edu (heli-fishing.eos.ncsu.edu [152.1.68.52]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA25132 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 21:32:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from camattin@localhost) by heli-fishing.eos.ncsu.edu (8.8.4/EC02Jan97) id EAA19522; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 04:32:15 GMT Message-Id: <199704110432.EAA19522@heli-fishing.eos.ncsu.edu> Subject: Re: XFree86 3.2 causes constant 1.0 load average? To: mark@quickweb.com (Mark Mayo) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 00:32:14 -0400 (EDT) Cc: taob@nbc.netcom.ca (Brian Tao), bartol@salk.edu (Tom Bartol), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG (FREEBSD-CURRENT-L) In-Reply-To: <19970410234347.04317@vinyl.quickweb.com> from "Mark Mayo" at Apr 10, 1997 11:43:47 PM From: camattin@ncsu.edu (Chris A. Mattingly) Reply-To: camattin@ncsu.edu X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL0b1/POP] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Mark Mayo wrote the following about "Re: XFree86 3.2 causes constant 1.0 load average?" on Thu Apr 10 23:43:47 1997 > > On Wed, Apr 09, 1997 at 01:47:57PM -0400, Brian Tao wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Tom Bartol wrote: > > > > > > I am running FreeBSD-3.0-970209-SNAP and AfterStep-1.0pre6 also and > > > I too occasionally see this same thing (this morning, in fact). I > > > have not been able to track it down. > > > > What X server are you using? Mach64? > > I also see this bogus load crap using Afterstep - but under Xinside's > matrox Millenium server... Again, it seems random when the load will rise.. > I've had this behaviour with Afterstep since version 1.0pre2, and since > the 2.2 October SNAP up to 2.2.1R right now. I've been seeing this too with -current, under XFree86 3.2 and 3.2A with fvwm95. Something else I've noticed is that serial traffic via usermode ppp causes the load to go higher than it used to.. but only some of the times, kinda like the 1.0 load. :-/ -Chris -- Chris Mattingly | My views are not necessarily those of my employers camattin@ncsu.edu | NC State University/ITECS | "Good programmers write good code; great Systems Programmer | programmers 'borrow' good code." -- Mike Gancarz