From owner-cvs-all Mon Sep 3 4:12:38 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CD437B401; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 04:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5CD093E28; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 04:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509563C12D; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 04:12:27 -0700 (PDT) To: Alexander Langer Cc: Kris Kennaway , Josef Karthauser , Paul Richards , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/update pkg_update.pl In-Reply-To: <20010903124146.A27078@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>; from alex@big.endian.de on "Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:41:46 +0200" Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 04:12:22 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010903111227.5CD093E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alexander Langer wrote: > > Is there any remaining need for this pkg_update implementation now > > that knu's portupgrade does such a complete job? > > Why is knu's portupgrade a port anyways and not developed in our src > tree? I guess one reason is that it depends on Ruby. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message