From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 06:21:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3E716A4CE; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:21:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net (vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B0443D39; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:21:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@corbulon.video-collage.com) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com ([151.204.231.237]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IDB00LCRWBQ2LU0@vms042.mailsrvcs.net>; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:21:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.comcorbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2E6LO9W061690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:21:25 -0500 Received: (from mi@localhost) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j2E6LOXV061689; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:21:24 -0500 (EST envelope-from mi) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:21:24 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin In-reply-to: <20050314054808.GB36011@toxic.magnesium.net> To: adamw@FreeBSD.org (Adam Weinberger) Message-id: <200503140621.j2E6LOXV061689@corbulon.video-collage.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040615, clamav-milter version 0.73a on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: intrusive PORTREVISION bumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:21:42 -0000 > Complaining to us won't help, because we will be following the exact > same procedure for the next release. Your best bet would be to try to > convince the openoffice team to read emails and PRs from time to time. Well, you will, I hope, exclude editors/oodict-all next time. */openoffice-templates should, probably, be left alone too. > That being said, if you can think of a better deployment plan for new > glib20 library versions, please let us know! I think, going through binaries (executables and libraries) installed by each "nominated" port with ldd ought to do it. Most of the ports are available as pre-built packages, fetching and examining them can be automated. -mi