From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 6 13:16:29 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA02564 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA02556 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA17368; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:13:50 -0700 (PDT) To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" cc: Michael Smith , hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: New nit in 2.2-960501-SNAP In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Jun 1996 10:16:25 EST." <199606061416.KAA11572@exalt.x.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 1996 13:13:50 -0700 Message-ID: <17366.834092030@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > You know, I don't find this sort of crap to be very helpful. Good > thing I'm not paying for it. > > I would have been really unhappy if I had run sysinstall and it had > newfs'd my disk. REALLY unhappy. OK, perhaps then it's time for clarification since you clearly would prefer to be treated in a more official manner: "System installations or upgrades using anything but the sysinstall tool are entirely unsupported and should be undertaken ONLY at the user's own risk. No technical support or other assistance can be rendered to those who install their systems in any other fashion. FreeBSD, Inc. thanks its customers for their cooperation in this regard. " There, that's the sort of response you'd get if you were paying for it. Since you're not, I think being told essentially the same thing in a less politically correct fashion ("Hey, BOZO, you want to shoot your feet off don't come f**king crying to us, OK?" :-) is not entirely unexpected. :-) Jordan