Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 10:07:18 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: Shimon@i-Connect.Net (Simon Shapiro) Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2-BETA Questions Message-ID: <199701281707.KAA08287@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.970128004129.Shimon@i-Connect.Net> from "Simon Shapiro" at Jan 28, 97 00:00:34 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yea, I figured this much, but the Linux ``gurus'' insist, theirs is the > only ``correct'' NFS server... As I said, it works (very well!) the other > way around... Is it still in user space so that each packet in and out is required to cross a protection domain in each direction, and if it contains data to be read or written, another protection domain to obtain/save the data? PS: man mount_nfs (-P), man mount (-o resvport) Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701281707.KAA08287>