From owner-freebsd-security Wed Apr 18 21:27:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from casimir.physics.purdue.edu (casimir.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.146.111]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4259837B422 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 21:27:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@physics.purdue.edu) Received: by casimir.physics.purdue.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9B6CE1BD72; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 23:25:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 23:25:16 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: "Yuri A. Wolf" Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ntp-4.0.99k23? Message-ID: <20010418232516.V5017@casimir.physics.purdue.edu> Reply-To: Will Andrews References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4cokgWgqjr3t8EL1" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: ; from subs@ovk.altai.ru on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:21:53AM +0700 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.18 sparc64 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --4cokgWgqjr3t8EL1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:21:53AM +0700, Yuri A. Wolf wrote: > After I upgraded to ntp-4.0.99k_2 I noted that ntp port changed again to > ntp-4.0.99k23. >=20 > Is the 1st one vulnerable? Is the 2d one ok? Neither are vulnerable. --=20 wca --4cokgWgqjr3t8EL1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE63misF47idPgWcsURAsH+AJ9a6jEQi14LrKu0z6Af5/9k5cfJywCcCngZ iZMxVyY8emfOP54KwfMVwGs= =t0eV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4cokgWgqjr3t8EL1-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message