Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:50:56 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris H <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] WIP on fonts Message-ID: <20150320165056.GC87678@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <c8af33f759007ae8da2a1569aba9f609@ultimatedns.net> References: <20150320153711.GB87678@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <c8af33f759007ae8da2a1569aba9f609@ultimatedns.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 09:28:15AM -0700, Chris H wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:37:13 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> =
wrote
>=20
> > Hi all,
> >=20
> > Some of you may have notice some work on the font area.
> >=20
> > The goal of this work is to prevent every single font package to act
> > differently and most of the time not correctly.
> ..
> > 3/ Move all fonts from ${LOCALBASE}/lib/X11/fonts to ${LOCALBASE}/share=
/fonts
>=20
> Won't this invalidate the current entries in /etc/X11/xorg.conf?
> eg;
> FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/{...}"
>=20
> P.S. Thanks for doing this. Consistency is nice! :)
>=20
> --Chris
>=20
Yes this will, that is why I plan to add an entry in UPDATING, anyway xorg =
is
supposed to be able to work without those FontPath now so it might be seaml=
ess
for most(all?) users.
Best regards,
Bapt
--PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlUMT/AACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzYqgCbBGaymkTk7nG74/eRgAbdO80j
nSYAoIjQxhHP/oenbciWnKUnm3qUUWPX
=bzuh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150320165056.GC87678>