From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 2 16:34:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59630C7; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:34:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3688FECF; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95B11B968; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:34:19 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Kevin Lo Subject: Re: svn commit: r248997 - head/sys/conf Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:34:00 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p25; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201304020557.r325vbnA069100@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201304020557.r325vbnA069100@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304021234.00772.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:34:19 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:34:20 -0000 On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:57:37 am Kevin Lo wrote: > Author: kevlo > Date: Tue Apr 2 05:57:36 2013 > New Revision: 248997 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248997 > > Log: > Add VIMAGE to NOTES. > > Reviewed by: zec > > Modified: > head/sys/conf/NOTES Hmm, we've intentionally not done that to date (see how x86 conf Makefiles create separate LINT-VIMAGE configs). It might be good to keep these but comment them out? We need to build both LINTS to get good coverage. Also, I thought VIMAGE wasn't known to be buildable on non-x86? -- John Baldwin