Date: 22 Apr 2008 19:51:59 +0200 From: "Arno J. Klaassen" <arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs-server silent data corruption Message-ID: <wpve29u69s.fsf@heho.snv.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20080421191925.GT73016@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <wpmyno2kqe.fsf@heho.snv.jussieu.fr> <20080421094718.GY25623@hub.freebsd.org> <wp63ubp8e0.fsf@heho.snv.jussieu.fr> <20080421154333.GA96237@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <wp4p9vawmf.fsf@heho.snv.jussieu.fr> <20080421191925.GT73016@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> writes: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 08:30:48PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: > >NB, (CC to kris@ for this) why is memtest86 port marked as i386-only? > > Basically because it's a bootable i386 binary image. yop, but building it could be allowed on more archs (at least amd64 imho) but no hard feelings! just a thought Best, Arno
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?wpve29u69s.fsf>