Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 07:44:45 -0500 From: D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: deepak@ai.net, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel-loadable Root Kits Message-ID: <20010908074445.A77252@sheol.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20010908143231.A53801@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>; from alex@big.endian.de on Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 02:32:31PM %2B0200 References: <GPEOJKGHAMKFIOMAGMDIGEHGFHAA.deepak_ai.net@ns.sol.net> <200109081052.f88AqRG30016@sheol.localdomain> <20010908141700.A53738@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <20010908072542.A57605@sheol.localdomain> <20010908143231.A53801@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 08, at 02:32 PM, Alexander Langer wrote: > > Thus spake D J Hawkey Jr (hawkeyd@visi.com): > > > > This still lets you load own kernel modules. > > Not if you blow away the /modules directory (note that I haven't tried > > this). > > /me hands Dave a decent C compiler and some C h0h0magic. I didn't write "build the kernel without it". As I wrote, I hadn't tried it. I take it one cannot remove that tree, even after seeing that the kernel doesn't need it? I'm meaning run-time here, not build-time. > Alex Dave -- Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010908074445.A77252>