Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 17:38:24 -0800 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBsd and SCO Message-ID: <200403061738.24301.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <87d67pwiiz.fsf@strauser.com> References: <BAY4-F11FZ1HCONkTJD00019a5d@hotmail.com> <87d67pwiiz.fsf@strauser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 06 March 2004 05:30 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > At 2004-03-06T23:06:32Z, "Raymond Wiegand" <rgmcsierra2000@msn.com>=20 writes: > > [...] will they be going after BSD user next or is BSD not at all > > based on their kernal or what every they claim is theirs property. > > Who can tell. They may decide that Solaris, Mac OS X, or Windows is > also based on their "intellectual property" and start threatening > those users next. > > In other words, do *not* base your technology plans on anything SCO > says or does. They should be gone soon. =46rom past experience, I always thought that the useful features in Unix=20 came from BSD. If they break the agreement and have to remove BSDisms,=20 I would hate to have to use SCO's version :). Kent =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403061738.24301.kstewart>