From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  6 17:38:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619D916A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  6 Mar 2004 17:38:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5B243D1F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  6 Mar 2004 17:38:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kstewart@owt.com)
Received: from localhost.invalid (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233])
	by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i271cAfH027016
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 17:38:10 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 17:38:24 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.6
References: <BAY4-F11FZ1HCONkTJD00019a5d@hotmail.com>
	<87d67pwiiz.fsf@strauser.com>
In-Reply-To: <87d67pwiiz.fsf@strauser.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200403061738.24301.kstewart@owt.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBsd and SCO
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 01:38:25 -0000

On Saturday 06 March 2004 05:30 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> At 2004-03-06T23:06:32Z, "Raymond Wiegand" <rgmcsierra2000@msn.com>=20
writes:
> > [...] will they be going after BSD user next or is BSD not at all
> > based on their kernal or what every they claim is theirs property.
>
> Who can tell.  They may decide that Solaris, Mac OS X, or Windows is
> also based on their "intellectual property" and start threatening
> those users next.
>
> In other words, do *not* base your technology plans on anything SCO
> says or does.  They should be gone soon.

=46rom past experience, I always thought that the useful features in Unix=20
came from BSD. If they break the agreement and have to remove BSDisms,=20
I would hate to have to use SCO's version :).

Kent

=2D-=20
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html