From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 30 02:54:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A8C106566B for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 02:54:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spawk@acm.poly.edu) Received: from acm.poly.edu (acm.poly.edu [128.238.9.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004D68FC16 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 02:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8802 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2010 02:54:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (spawk@96.224.221.101) by acm.poly.edu with CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 Dec 2010 02:54:30 -0000 Message-ID: <4D1BF45D.7070703@acm.poly.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:54:21 -0500 From: Boris Kochergin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101031 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucius Windschuh References: <4D1B9071.4020403@acm.poly.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jeff Roberson Subject: Re: SUJ doesn't work with GELI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 02:54:31 -0000 On 12/29/10 21:44, Lucius Windschuh wrote: > 2010/12/29 Boris Kochergin: >> Ahoy. I'm having trouble enabling SUJ on a UFS filesystem that lives on top >> of a GELI device. The system is an i386 -CURRENT build from December 24th. I >> first noticed the problem when it happened with an actual disk, but here is >> an example with a memory disk for ease of reproduction: > Hi Boris. > The problem is, as you may have already noticed, the "non-standard" > block size of 4k of the GELI device. > If you specify the tradiditional block size of 512 bytes when > initializing the GELI provider, it should work. > > I sent an email to Jeff, the answer on April 27 was: >> Thanks for the repro. This is an interesting case. I'll have to slightly rewrite the directory handling code in tunefs but it should not take long. > But I forgot to remind Jeff about this issue, as it seems. So I'll try > again with this mail... > > Regards, > > Lucius Aha. I hadn't thought of that. Thanks for the insight. -Boris