From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 11:13:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3F037B401; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6D443F93; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:13:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h45IDVSQ096646; Mon, 5 May 2003 19:13:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h45IDVCC096645; Mon, 5 May 2003 19:13:31 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h45IAj8c073420; Mon, 5 May 2003 19:10:45 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200305051810.h45IAj8c073420@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 May 2003 07:01:13 CDT." <20030505120113.GB21530@madman.celabo.org> Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 19:10:45 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Mark Murray cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NO_KERBEROS (was Re: cvs commit: src/kerberos5 ...) X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 18:13:34 -0000 "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 12:58:44AM -0700, Mark Murray wrote: > > Log: > > Turn MAKE_KERBEROS5 into NO_KERBEROS by negating the logic. Some extra > > cleanups were necessary in release/Makefile, and the tinderbox code > > was syntax checked, not run checked. > > Hi, Mark! Yo! > Thanks so much! This takes care of many issues which were bothering > me. First and foremost, now we no longer have the bad situation where > the Kerberos bits were installed by default, but they were not rebuilt > by default during `make world'. This was leaving stale Kerberos > libraries and utilities in many situations. Now the Kerberos bits are > treated more like the other (in theory) `optional' components of `make > world'. That's why I like it. :-) > Binary patches (such as those occassionally issued by the SO team and > those by 3rd parties such as Colin's updater) will be more widely > applicable now. > > This should cut make release times a wee bit, since we don't have to > build telnet and ssh quite so many times. (Now if we could only > dispatch the `crypto' distribution :-) There are some build-logic simplifications that can be done, but I don't wish to mess with those till 5.1 is out of the door. > Finally, this brings us in line with the other BSDs (NetBSD, OpenBSD, > and Mac OS X), which all have Kerberos built-in. Excellent! M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH