From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 1 13:52:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA21443 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 13:52:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA21412 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 13:52:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA07742; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 13:51:56 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199804012151.NAA07742@implode.root.com> To: spork cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp.cdrom.com In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Apr 1998 09:31:39 EST." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Wed, 01 Apr 1998 13:51:56 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >> > Right at the moment the limit is bandwidth - mostly with Sprint and MCI >> > through the west coast NAPs. The secondary limit is CPU, but that only >> > >> > -DG > >>From my view on the east coast, I usually see the slowdown within CRL. I >can ping their NYNAP router without packet loss, but taking them cross >country usually results in ~20% packet loss on a bad day... The return path is via the west coast NAPs, but recently I've seen a small amount of packet loss to the east coast during peak daytime hours. CRL is adding new backbone capacity so I suspect this to only be a temporary problem. For us, the CRL backbone is only used to carry packet ACKs, so it isn't nearly as big a problem for us as the west coast NAPs are (where nearly all of our traffic is egressed). -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message