From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Sat Jun 20 20:23:54 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC94333DB8; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 20:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49q6Zd6WW8z3XKd; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 20:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id D09441CCF5; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 20:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 20:23:53 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Colin Percival Cc: Warner Losh , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r362444 - head/sbin/dump Message-ID: <20200620202353.GB8270@FreeBSD.org> References: <202006202006.05KK6EqK016498@repo.freebsd.org> <01000172d35c996f-523a3c65-2f6b-472e-ad04-070e2b22bfe0-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20200620201934.GA8270@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200620201934.GA8270@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 20:23:54 -0000 On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 08:19:35PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > ... > Please, just open a DR for that so all interested parties can participate > and fine-tune particular grammar and language choices. Also, r362447 > should be reverted on the same grounds as r362422. Perhaps full backout is not necessary as r362447 looks mostly okay, but it would be nice to do something about enworker(). ./danfe