From owner-freebsd-net  Fri Mar 16  7:36:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from cody.jharris.com (cody.jharris.com [205.238.128.83])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A2C9237B718; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 07:36:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nick@rogness.net)
Received: from localhost (nick@localhost)
	by cody.jharris.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2GFeFM09930;
	Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:40:15 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from nick@rogness.net)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:40:15 -0600 (CST)
From: Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net>
X-Sender: nick@cody.jharris.com
To: Eugene Polovnikov <paranoid@brain-fag.org>
Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: nos-tun & multihomed machines
In-Reply-To: <20010316164016.A52749@zssm.zp.ua>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103160936490.9691-100000@cody.jharris.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Eugene Polovnikov wrote:

[snip]
> 
> And I agree that when all nos-tun's functions be implemented nos-tun
> must go away.

	One thing I don't like about gif is you have to rebuild the kernel
	when you want to add another gif interface...or is there another
	way (besides building it with a huge number up front)?  Whereas
	with nos-tun you just MAKEDEV a new tunnel device and your in
	business.


Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net>
- Keep on routing in a Free World...  
  "FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!"


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message