From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 23:21:24 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7182416A46B for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:21:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from mx4.netclusive.de (mx4.netclusive.de [89.110.132.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC8513C4B0 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:21:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Fdc73.f.ppp-pool.de [195.4.220.115]) (Authenticated sender: ncf1534p2) by mx4.netclusive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6108E5E00C1 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:21:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 34BEB15217; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:11:58 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.devel.sparc Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:11:58 +0200 (CEST) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <2213.5369-3380-502956735-1192610714@email.cz> <20071017.182350.193693728.hrs@allbsd.org> <47161875.4030005@alaska.net> <1192630994.94110.5.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: sunny.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1192662718 32614 192.168.100.5 (17 Oct 2007 23:11:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:11:58 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD/6.2-RELEASE-p8 (sparc64)) Subject: Re: FBSD on SunBlade 1500 Silver X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:21:24 -0000 On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:23:13 +0100 Gavin Atkinson wrote: > UltraSPARC III is actually very similar to UltraSPARC II I didn't go into this into great detail but I did read that the CPUs sucked more and more with rising numbers. There were even rumours out there that Sun didn't release the IV's specs because they would embarress themselves. There were supposedly many software work-arounds for bugs within SunOS that would make Intel's mess-ups look quite harmless. :-) Regards Chris