From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 31 04:02:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA28293 for current-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 04:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.dk.tfs.com (critter.phk.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA28281 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 04:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.dk.tfs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.dk.tfs.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA01274; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 13:01:29 +0200 (CEST) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Chuck Robey , FreeBSD current From: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: core group topics In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:34:53 PDT." <20284.870334493@time.cdrom.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 13:01:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1272.870346888@critter.dk.tfs.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <20284.870334493@time.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >> I agree. How long have we had to discuss it so far? I think you'll have >> to agree, it's been more than long enough. It feels more like a case of >> "if we ignore it long enough, maybe it'll go away." There are ways to > >Well, that's one way to look at it. Another way to look at it is that >a significant percentage of people looking at the whole idea have so >far gone "No, I'm outright OPPOSED to this idea. I do not want ELF." >It's not as passive a situation as you might think. Are we getting the kernel & userland mixed up here ? I belive there is strong agreement for ELF for the kernel... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.