From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jun 29 6:31:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC6B37B407 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 06:31:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #6) id 15FyMm-000F8x-00 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:31:24 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f5TDVOl60516 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:31:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:31:24 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Win2k a rewrite or not??? Message-ID: <20010629143124.B60314@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've heard win2k was a near total re-write of the codebase, and i've heard it is just a relabeled, reworked NT would-have-been 5.0. Does anybody know the truth on this? Jonathon -- Microsoft complaining about the source license used by Linux is like the event horizon calling the kettle black. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message