Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:41:47 +0800
From:      Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org>
To:        Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,  svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r467193 - in head/www/gitlab: . files
Message-ID:  <CAMHz58RD9rtyqBLV6nsZ2naOvGRiO7PDPAGWZ8Vemnz-g1J6cw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e1a55c7b-1ad1-36c8-ec3d-f806702feed5@fechner.net>
References:  <201804121833.w3CIXtgW077267@repo.freebsd.org> <e1a55c7b-1ad1-36c8-ec3d-f806702feed5@fechner.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 4:01 AM, Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
wrote:

> Dear sunpoet,
>
> Am 12.04.2018 um 20:33 schrieb Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh:
> > Log:
> >   Fix Gemfile for rubygem-default_value_for 3.1.0 update
> >
> >   - Bump PORTREVISION for package change
> >
> > Modified:
> >   head/www/gitlab/Makefile
> >   head/www/gitlab/files/patch-Gemfile
> I really enjoy your work and it is totally fine for me, if you upgrade a
> gem that you copy the old one and make sure that gitlab uses the old.
> (like you did with r467106, thanks a lot for this!)
>
> But please do not start to patch the Gemfile!
> This will break gitlab. Have you tested gitlab with this modification?
> (for sure not, I reported exactly that version of default_value_for
> upstream and they rolled back the change as it broke gitlab, they broke
> 3.0.4 and rolled back the modification with 3.0.5, now you changed
> gitlab to use the version that for sure will not work!)
>
> Please revert this modification and ask me (the maintainer) before you
> start to modify the port I maintain.
> Thanks a lot that you understand this.
>

Hi,

I think that default_value_for 3.0.4 update is a different case.
gitlab wats default_value_for ~> 3.0.0 and it fits the rule.

I would like to keep less number of gems with multiple versions in the
ports tree.
It will sometimes make the dependency tree complex.
Therefore, I would not copy the old version unless it's necessary.

In this case, the only change between default_value_for 3.0.5 and 3.1.0 is
Rails 5.2 support [1].
I don't think it breaks gitlab.
Can you please confirm if it really breaks gitlab?
If so, I'll revert it as soon as possible.

Thanks,
sunpoet

[1]
https://github.com/FooBarWidget/default_value_for/commit/2d1802cf4836eb6dd7=
2f1469378e383e79f83fdf


> Gru=C3=9F
> Matthias
>
> --
>
> "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
> build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
> produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." --
> Rich Cook
>
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMHz58RD9rtyqBLV6nsZ2naOvGRiO7PDPAGWZ8Vemnz-g1J6cw>