From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jun 27 14:47:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from eiche.priconet.de (eiche.priconet.de [193.100.126.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F10F37B8F1 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:47:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from martin@eiche.priconet.de) Received: (from martin@localhost) by eiche.priconet.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA16249; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:46:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from martin) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:46:44 +0200 From: Martin Kraft To: Trevor Johnson Cc: tkato@prontomail.ne.jp, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, kouhia@nic.funet.fi Subject: Re: ports/19200: new port: audio/xwave Message-ID: <20000627234642.A16228@eiche.priconet.de> References: <200006121020.DAA10189@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from trevor@jpj.net on Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 07:57:16AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 07:57:16AM -0400, Trevor Johnson wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, KATO Tsuguru wrote: > > > PR of xwave port is already submitted (not commited yet) as ports/18879. > > I'm sorry, but it escaped my notice. By the way, it is ports/18779 [..] > > The version I submitted (version 2) has some enhancements by Juhana Kouhia > . Like version 0.6, it seems not to be maintained > any longer. The version you found seems to be maintained, and may be > better just for that reason. I am sorry for the delay of my response; too much to do ... Trevor, I make'd and installed your port. Without any problems. Did not examine the differences between our ports in detail. I tried to use xwave2 and encountered some differences to the basic xwave 0.6, as ported by myself: 1. The divided recording level meter (short and long time averages) in xwave2 is certainly an advantage over xwave 0.6. 2. There seems to be an error in xwave2, drawing the signal levels of a loaded piece of music, wether the sound file was recorded freshly or loaded from a wav file: the signal level is the maximum level almost over all the time, so I get more or less a red and a blue rectangle. Seems to bee only a problem of the drawing; there is no difference between 0.6 and 2 while playing this piece of sound. 3. While recording, in xwave2 there seems to be an error in the continuous display of recorded time and disk space; some numeric / data type error: the figures skip many times from positive to negative numbers; their values seems to be of few worth. xwave 0.6 reports correct time and space all the time. Did not check any other features of xwave 2. At this time and today's state of xwave 2, it is my suggestion, that we commit at least a port of the original xwave 0.6. Would the port presented by myself (port/18779) be ok for xwave 0.6? Thanks Martin Kraft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message