From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Jul  5 15:10:43 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA08951
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 15:10:43 -0700
Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA08945
          for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 15:10:42 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA15864; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 15:10:28 -0700
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 1995 15:10:28 -0700
Message-Id: <199507052210.PAA15864@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au
CC: taob@io.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199507050841.SAA17094@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> (message from Michael Smith on Wed, 5 Jul 1995 18:11:47 +0930 (CST))
Subject: Re: Tk 4.0 and Tcl 7.4 releases
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Yup, on initial testing they both work fine.  I need to stick with 
 * earlier versions coz I use XF 8(

Cool.  Someone want to make a port?  I guess Tk should go to x11/tk4,
so that we can still have ver 3.6 around.  What do you think about
Tcl-7.4?  How "incompatible" is it with 7.3?

Satoshi (not a Tcl/Tk hacker :)