From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Mar 21 14: 3:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from sable.cc.vt.edu (sable.cc.vt.edu [128.173.16.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9AE37BBB8 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:03:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nmanisca@vt.edu) Received: from mail.vt.edu (gkar.cc.vt.edu [128.173.16.40]) by sable.cc.vt.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03966 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 17:03:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from dog ([198.82.106.223]) by gkar.cc.vt.edu (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.05.24.18.28.p7) with SMTP id <0FRS00K6JL9QW2@gkar.cc.vt.edu> for freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 17:03:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 17:02:40 -0500 From: nm Subject: Re: success with osf1_base port? X-Sender: nmanisca@mail.vt.edu To: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <3.0.32.20000321170240.04d2a100@mail.vt.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 04:59 PM 3/21/00 -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > >nm writes: > > Anyone have success with the osf1_base port on > > 4.0-RELEASE? > > > > the netscape rpm gets downloaded and rpm2cpio gets > > registered/installed, but the perl script (rpm2cpio) > > runs and seems to do nothing at all... it just takes > > up memory and cpu... any one else see this happen? > > > > Is there a 'better' way to get netscape running? > >It actually works, assuming you have sufficent patience. > >The rpm2cpio that's part of the rpm package runs *much* quicker. Thanks for the quick replies! Hmm... well I guess I will just let it run... I will time it too Nick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message