Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 8 Feb 2004 23:23:43 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        "W. Sierke" <ws+freebsd-questions@au.dyndns.ws>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: How to deal with package conflicts (apache)?
Message-ID:  <20040209072343.GA3277@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <05dc01c3eed9$92527fe0$8464a8c0@ovirt.dyndns.ws>
References:  <05dc01c3eed9$92527fe0$8464a8c0@ovirt.dyndns.ws>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 05:24:32PM +1030, W. Sierke wrote:
> How should I deal with package conflicts such as
> apache13/apache13-mod_ssl...
>=20
> I've installed apache13-mod_ssl but a couple of other ports I want to
> install want apache13 (specifically apache-1.3.29_1) which complains of a
> package conflict (with apache+mod_ssl-1.3.29+2.8.16) so I'll have to force
> the installation. Is there a way of convincing the new packages that
> apache13-mod_ssl is an adequate substitute for apache13?

Set the APACHE_PORT variable (to www/apachewhatever) in
/etc/make.conf.  This will only work with ports, not packages, for
which one can only use the default settings.

Kris

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAJzV/Wry0BWjoQKURAvWNAJwJCfOdiwerQuxul6JN7sr4lnbp/wCZAbYq
k++xCb7HsZKF354eHmYlPqI=
=cT95
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040209072343.GA3277>