From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Aug 8 17:52:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320BABB340E for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9FB2170C for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:52:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u78HqSSj075337 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:52:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211142] net/samba4{2,3,4}: ADS option should enforce (imply) WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:52:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: prj@rootwyrm.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:52:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211142 --- Comment #10 from prj@rootwyrm.com --- (In reply to Mark Felder from comment #8) Yep. I was hoping to stop-gap (this is blocking security/sssd improvements)= but the same issue seen here was not reproducing in clean tree for me. I'm confident saying there is definitely something misbehaving in bsd.ldap.mk a= nd the current state of it is now actively blocking multiple items. The 'easy' fix is for ADS to be removed from the samba4{2,3,4} OPTIONS_DEFA= ULT. But removing ADS from OPTIONS_DEFAULT has extreme impacts - not only does it affect any port making use of samba4*, but it will completely cripple expec= ted default functionality of samba itself. DEFAULT_VERSIONS is obviously preferable, but unless it can reliably force WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL, it would not address the issue here. Not only that, but frankly, I don't see a sound reason for it. bsd.ldap.mk still allows 2.3, b= ut all of those ports expired in 2013 it turns out. So as it is bsd.ldap.mk sh= ould be considered broken.=20 At current, it looks like there are 92 ports (including expired ports) which depend on openldap24-client, and zero conflicts with either port. Since SASL extends functionality, rather than changes, is there any reason to not remo= ve bsd.ldap.mk, combine openldap24-client and openldap24-sasl-client, and make SASL OPTIONS_DEFAULT for the openldap port? (I'm sure there probably was, b= ut it seems far less likely now.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=