From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Dec 29 12: 7:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from megaweapon.zigg.com (megaweapon.zigg.com [206.114.60.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C23114DA2 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 12:07:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@zigg.com) Received: from localhost (matt@localhost) by megaweapon.zigg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA09036; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:07:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matt@zigg.com) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:07:32 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Behrens To: Peter Wemm Cc: tsikora@powerusersbbs.com, "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Temperature In-Reply-To: <19991229191516.17D671CA0@overcee.netplex.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [Taking out the -hackers crosspost] On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: > The main difference is that Linux halts the cpu in the idle loop, we don't. > As a result the cpu is in a tight spin waiting for a process to become > scheduleable. I have some patches half-done that I've been working on for > 4.0 that should probably be able to be adapted to the 3.x series. Huh?! So the FAQ is wrong? (See .) Also, when the did this (apparently) change? The original poster referred to this being a new problem. - -- Matt Behrens Owner/Administrator, zigg.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE4amoG+xq4JbgNGlMRAhhjAKCSKGQxp5vFuB7qYU1RZuqwJwMANACfTxop fNrl6jam9rJpmKIDBnOvgu8= =KFHE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message