From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 15 06:38:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB28B9A for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646A4BC6 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72441 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2013 07:28:39 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Jul 2013 07:28:39 -0000 Message-ID: <51E398F3.40008@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:38:43 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2 References: <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> <51E1061F.3050804@ixsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <51E1061F.3050804@ixsystems.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:38:47 -0000 On 13.07.2013 09:47, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Andre, we have a number of people running this patch in the following configurations: > > 6-8GB ram + 10gigE ethernet using iozone over NFS. As you haven't seen any problems yet I've asked RE to green light the MFC. -- Andre > We're rolling it into the PCBSD rolling update as well. I'm thinking it makes sense to roll this > into the 9.2 release to give us more scalability. > > -Alfred > > > On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: >> On 07.07.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>> Andre, >>> >>> Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for auto-tuning -stable before 9.2? >> >> I simply ran out of time on Friday and MFCing such a big change requires >> more testing. >> >>> I fear (maybe unnecessarily?) that we are about to ship yet another release that can't do basic >>> 10gigE when sufficient memory exists. >> >> There was some debate with myself whether such a behavior changing MFC >> would be appropriate for a mid-stream stable release. I guess yes, though >> a number of people who currently set the parameters manually would have >> to remove their tuning settings. >> >>> If you don't have time, then let me know and I'll see what I can do. >> >> Can you help me with with testing? >> > >