From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Oct 8 16:47:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA22188 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 16:47:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA22179 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 16:46:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id RAA07307; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 17:46:49 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.1.19981008173746.0429fc30@mail.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 17:40:54 -0600 To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG, chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: GPL kills KDE distribution In-Reply-To: <199810082246.PAA17690@kithrup.com> References: <199810082114.OAA00692.kithrup.freebsd.chat@dingo.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, I can't help thinking that if the KDE people had used a Berkeley-esque license, they'd be fine. Maybe we should recommend this. Incidentally, the GPL has a chilling effect on the development of drivers for hardware for the same reason it runs into problems with KDE. Suppose a hardware vendor is willing to supply a driver in object code form, but doesn't want to open the source because it reveals hardware trade secrets or gives it an "edge" over other companies using similar chips. The Berkeley license doesn't preclude linking in someone's closed source driver; the GPL does. We have an edge here that perhaps we should be exploiting. --Brett At 03:46 PM 10/8/98 -0700, Sean Eric Fagan wrote: >In article <199810082114.OAA00692.kithrup.freebsd.chat@dingo.cdrom.com> you >write: >>Chalk one up to the GPL really screwing things up. 8( > >No, chalk it up to people using non-free licensing terms (e.g., Qt's license) >and other people insisting that onl non-GPL licenses are truly free. > >You get what you deserve: you want software to be able to be non-free, you >end up with software that is non-free. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message