From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 05:18:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289EB37B401 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 05:18:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B56843FBD for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 05:18:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h56CIBab045446 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 05:18:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h56CIBij045445 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 05:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 05:18:11 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200306061218.h56CIBij045445@bunrab.catwhisker.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030605235254.W5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg> Subject: Re: Way forward with BIND 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 12:18:12 -0000 >Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 00:09:04 -0700 (PDT) >From: Doug Barton >To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org >Subject: Way forward with BIND 8 >Reply-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org >... >Because there are over 14k lines of diff between the source for 8.3.5 and >8.4.0, I'm hesitant to import the latter right away. Instead, as the >nominal BIND maintainer, I'm proposing the following plan: [Plan itself elided; it's in the archives....] As someone who tends to be fairly conservative about deploying new software -- especially software that is as critical as name resolution -- the plan Works For Me (tm). Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Based on what I have seen to date, the use of Microsoft products is not consistent with reliability. I recommend FreeBSD for reliable systems.