From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 11 19:11:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A81916A41F; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:11:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob@hudson-trading.com) Received: from daemon.mistermishap.net (167-49.nyc.dsl.access.net [166.84.167.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D250E43D53; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:11:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob@hudson-trading.com) Received: from daemon.mistermishap.net (localhost.mistermishap.net [127.0.0.1]) by daemon.mistermishap.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j9BJBKmU050095; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:11:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rob@hudson-trading.com) Received: from localhost (rob@localhost) by daemon.mistermishap.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id j9BJBJur050092; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:11:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: daemon.mistermishap.net: rob owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:11:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Rob Watt X-X-Sender: rob@daemon.mistermishap.net To: Don Lewis In-Reply-To: <20051010095330.C42520@daemon.mistermishap.net> Message-ID: <20051011150721.F49494@daemon.mistermishap.net> References: <200510080608.j9868bZi034671@gw.catspoiler.org> <20051010095330.C42520@daemon.mistermishap.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, mikep@hudson-trading.com, Jason Carroll Subject: Re: freebsd-5.4-stable panics X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:11:22 -0000 On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Rob Watt wrote: > Don, > > On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Don Lewis wrote: > > > Both HEAD and RELENG_6 have been patched. I've tested the following > > patch for RELENG_5 on a uniprocessor sparc64 box. I'd appreciate it if > > anyone who was running into this problem on RELENG_5 with SMP hardare > > could test it before I do the MFC. > > We have a machine running with those patches applied. We need to do some > other tests on it today, but tonight we will run our threaded applications > that trigger the kern_proc problem in top. We should have results tomorrow > morning. Don, I had misunderstood what you had asked. I tested this on a 6.0 machine. I could not crash an amd64 SMP box running 6.0-BETA5 with this patch. I do not have a test box running RELENG_5 to try this patch on right now. If I can setup a test box I will let you know our results, but that may take a day or two. - Rob Watt