From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 13:51:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D75106566B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BB388FC08 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Feb 2011 13:51:48 -0000 Received: from adsl-244.109.242.33.tellas.gr (EHLO [192.168.73.192]) [109.242.33.244] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu002) with SMTP; 04 Feb 2011 14:51:48 +0100 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+sfRAH432sTY6z2L/BwKnfxWAp1x0SUVkUkYMSsN pKWuTdtma8AsyB Message-ID: <4D4C046E.9010107@gmx.com> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:51:42 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Damien Fleuriot References: <4D4BF293.9010604@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4D4BF293.9010604@my.gd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French Subject: Re: link aggregation - bundling 2 lagg interfaces together X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:51:50 -0000 On 2/4/2011 2:35 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > Even if I can't concatenate my 2 lagg interfaces into a failover one > over the 2 switches, the new setup will still be an improvement. Did you consider using STP? Are these switches RSTP capable? You could create a low priority bridge acting as leaf node in the STP domain. This will provide redundancy between different ethernet switches, I just don't know if RSTP converges fast enough for your needs. Just be a bit careful selecting the bridge's priority. A priority of 61440 will be probably fine. I am *almost* sure, that if_bridge works over if_laggs, perhaps you could combine the two. HTH, Nikos