From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 23:03:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A934716A4CE; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 23:03:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from VARK.homeunix.com (adsl-68-122-2-18.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.2.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944FA43D1F; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 23:03:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VARK.homeunix.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i15738mu011483; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 23:03:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by VARK.homeunix.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i15738or011482; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 23:03:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 23:03:08 -0800 From: David Schultz To: Colin Percival Message-ID: <20040205070308.GA11291@VARK.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Colin Percival , Ruslan Ermilov , current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <6.0.1.1.1.20040130093702.03d94920@imap.sfu.ca> <20040130095002.GA30771@FreeBSD.org.ua> <6.0.1.1.1.20040130095204.03da97e8@imap.sfu.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.1.20040130095204.03da97e8@imap.sfu.ca> cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: duplicate $FreeBSD$ IDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 07:03:15 -0000 On Fri, Jan 30, 2004, Colin Percival wrote: > At 09:50 30/01/2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:43:35AM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > >> Would anyone have object to my working through the tree > >> and removing these duplicates? > > > >Certainly not, but please note that there are a few exceptions > >where duplication is on purpose, e.g., in the style(9) manpage > >itself. ;) > > Of course. style.9, two contrib files, sys/cdefs.h, and > probably a few others I'd leave untouched. But that still > leaves lots of files to fix. There are supposed to be two in libc/stdio/vfw{print,scan}f.c as well, in order to keep them in sync with vf{print,scan}f.c, respectively.