From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 26 11:23:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC02106564A; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1268FC12; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C3346B06; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:23:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:23:57 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Adrian Chadd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <35765857-1314243257-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-329610575-@b2.c15.bise7.blackberry> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru, mdf@freebsd.org, Jonathan Anderson , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Official git export (was: Re: FreeBSD problems and preliminary ways to solve) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:23:58 -0000 On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 26 August 2011 18:04, Jonathan Anderson > wrote: > >> The Gitorious wiki page (http://wiki.freebsd.org/Gitorious) claims that >> git-svn can be successfully used with our SVN server with a command like: > > [snip] > > Great, so which tree do I clone to be able to do this? :) Or is it expected > that I'll simply run my own git tree? Do all of the git commit hashes get > calculated in a predictable way when thirty different developers run a git > to svn import? Per my earlier comments, I think we've reached the juncture where a "blessed" svn2git export would be extremely helpful. > Ie, can people then push their git branches to some shared repository, so > people can engage in git-like development mashing? I suspect quite a bit will end up in github just due to its accessibility, but hosting our own is certainly also an option. In some sense, this strikes me as secondary to establishing some of the details about how to prepare patches, known nits, and having an authoritative origin. Robert