From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 5 07:46:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA04067 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 07:46:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from itchy.mosquito.com (itchy.mosquito.com [206.205.132.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA04060 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 07:46:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from boot@localhost) by itchy.mosquito.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA00772; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:46:02 -0500 From: Bruce Bauman Message-Id: <199602051546.KAA00772@itchy.mosquito.com> Subject: confusion about routing To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:46:02 -0500 (EST) Cc: boot@itchy.mosquito.com (Bruce Bauman) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I am a small ISP with 2 FreeBSD machines, 2 Livingston portmasters, and a Cisco router. We were running 'routed -s' on our FreeBSD machines without problems, even though I don't know if this was the right thing to do. We added another domain, so our network interface (de0) now has an alias for another address. Now we get messages like this: Feb 5 10:39:27 itchy routed[647]: deleting route to interface de0 (timed out) Feb 5 10:39:27 itchy routed[647]: re-installing interface de0 Feb 5 10:42:27 itchy routed[647]: deleting route to interface de0 (timed out) Feb 5 10:42:27 itchy routed[647]: re-installing interface de0 Any suggestions on what we SHOULD be doing? Thanks in advance. -- Bruce