From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Jan 20 19:33:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B645837B400 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:33:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA63404; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 04:33:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Jason Evans Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: First vm_zone patch References: <20010120124200.O69199@canonware.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Jan 2001 04:33:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: Jason Evans's message of "20 Jan 2001 12:42:06 -0800, Sat, 20 Jan 2001 12:42:00 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jason Evans writes: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 08:20:58PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > The next step is to replace the simple_lock with a mutex, and add a > > top-level mutex to protect zlist. > FYI, I'm currently testing a patch that completely removes simplelocks. Does that mean I should give up reworking vm_zone? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message