From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 17:14:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3251516A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:14:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (pemaquid.safeport.com [204.156.12.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE81043D1D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:14:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j08HEQ1l050595; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:14:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost)j08HEPo7050592; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:14:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pemaquid.safeport.com: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:14:25 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com To: Joe Altman In-Reply-To: <20050108055611.GA27077@panix.com> Message-ID: <20050108115902.S50168@pemaquid.safeport.com> References: <20050106232123.AC3BA16A4D2@hub.freebsd.org> <20050108055611.GA27077@panix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Ronny Fischer Subject: Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:14:29 -0000 Thanks Joe I will try to upgrade. My experience was the same, in that the problem tracked X (both projects) across several levels of 4.x and 5.x. The vesa drive works okay, but I miss the larger screen and better font rendering. On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Joe Altman wrote: > Doug, Ronny... > > I'm running 4.11 with xorg 6.8.1, built from source on December 28, > 2004 using a Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x on an IBM ThinkPad A20m. I have > a default depth of 24 bits, and a resolution of 1024x768. I am using > the ati driver. > > Ronny: I see that the query is for 5.3, but I thought that perhaps my > experience would indicate that the ATI chip seems to work fine w/ the > most recent version of xorg; or rather, the source as it existed on > December 28th. > > Doug: I remember that you and I encountered the same issue, back in > September or thereabouts, WRT the ATI chip? I'm happy to report what > is above: it seems to be safe to use the ati driver w/ the newest > source for xorg and the chip in question. > > HTH, best regards, > > Joe > _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601