From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 16 08:50:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EF8729 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EF18CF for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r3G8o0ot011669 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:50:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r3G8o0Sh011668; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:50:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:50:00 GMT Message-Id: <201304160850.r3G8o0Sh011668@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Danny Warren Subject: Re: ports/177877: [patch] net-mgmt/cnagios: update to 0.30 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Danny Warren List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:50:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/177877; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Danny Warren To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, danny@dannywarren.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/177877: [patch] net-mgmt/cnagios: update to 0.30 release Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:45:21 -0700 Thanks, I appreciate you jumping on this so quickly. The new upstream release really helps with with nagios 3.5.x setups. As an aside, it looks like the "last updated time" bug still exists on cnagios 0.30 under freebsd. That was broken in 0.29 as well, just in a slightly different way. I will either submit a separate PR with a patch or contact the upstream author about it, but just a heads up in case you wanted to hold off on updating the port until that is resolved.