From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 1 20:40:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (216-200-29-190.snj0.flashcom.net [216.200.29.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7E514E48; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 20:40:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA03509; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 20:38:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199908020338.UAA03509@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Assar Westerlund Cc: Mark Murray , Andreas Klemm , current@FreeBSD.ORG, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, nectar@FreeBSD.ORG, markm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kerberos 5, how to build whole system including X11R6 with it ? In-reply-to: Your message of "02 Aug 1999 04:53:31 +0200." <5lr9lm51w4.fsf@assaris.sics.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 20:38:30 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Fine , take it up with the kerberos group over at MIT -- it is hard to believe that they would not have patches for X11R6 and proper protocol. > Amancio Hasty writes: > > I would starrt by looking at the api and making the mods to X11R6 > > No, the protocol used in the X11R6 code is wrong. You would need to > design and implement a new one. > > > and if you can do a net search on xdm and kerberos -- there is an > > X11R6 xdm for kerberos 5 floating around. > > That's quite different. > > /assar -- Amancio Hasty hasty@rah.star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message