From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Fri Aug 19 13:48:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C06BBFA5F for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EABA1353 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1CD04BBFA59; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AC7BBFA58 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16B41338 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 19BF81FE2; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: vbox@localmail.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195FC1FE0 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6367212BB; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.129.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8231C1FE023; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:48:22 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [CFT] New version of webcamd, now v4.8.0.2 To: =?UTF-8?B?T3RhY8OtbGlv?= , vbox@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org References: From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <308013fd-1eec-eb3b-ca89-146f816803a9@selasky.org> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 15:52:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:29:28 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:48:26 -0000 On 08/19/16 15:42, Otacílio wrote: > Dears, I'm facing a huge CPU usage in the follow scenario: > > I'm using a 11.0-RC1 amd64 in vbox guest. The virtualbox-ose-additions > is 5.0.26. When I'm sharing my notebook integrated webcam with guest I > noted a increase of kernel CPU usage. But, when I open the webcam the > CPU usage increases at a point that the machine starts to freeze. The > camera works but the frame rate is low. I was using the version from > ports with this behavior but this new version stay with the same > problem. If I remember, with virtualbox series 4 this problem not > happens. So, can it be a webcamd or is really a new version of > virtualbox problem? > What does "top" say about webcamd's CPU usage? Maybe it is a problem inside the USB emulation in VBOX, that some functions become expensive. --HPS