Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:23:11 -0500 From: Sean Cavanaugh <millenia2000@hotmail.com> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: flash alternative Message-ID: <BAY126-W258F18D63BF29F586F4B2CCA8F0@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca> References: <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: millenia2000@hotmail.com To: af.gourmet@videotron.ca Subject: RE: flash alternative Date: Tue=2C 8 Dec 2009 10:22:25 -0500 > Date: Tue=2C 8 Dec 2009 10:00:01 -0500 > From: af.gourmet@videotron.ca > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: flash alternative >=20 > I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently > more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers=3B and that > it is "lighter" whatever that may mean. > Anyone know anything about this? > TIA > PJ if yer refering to "gnash" then yes it is lighter=2C but I have had issues = where it does not work for every flash based website. =
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAY126-W258F18D63BF29F586F4B2CCA8F0>