Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:54:15 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Martin Tournoij <carpetsmoker@xs4all.nl> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why so many tcl's and tk's Message-ID: <20070314215415.GA52663@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070314194532.GA93862@xs2.xs4all.nl> References: <45F71306.8040306@math.missouri.edu> <20070313215243.GA13418@xor.obsecurity.org> <45F72A58.5020106@math.missouri.edu> <20070314054859.GB18796@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070314194532.GA93862@xs2.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:45:32PM +0100, Martin Tournoij wrote: > It seems most ports work fine with tcl84, and that tcl<84 deps are > historical rather than technical (no one looked if the ports works > with tcl84). There is probably some low-hanging fruit which can be fixed for free just by changing the dependency, but the last time I checked most of the ports that are still stuck on old versions are there for a reason (i.e. they do not build or run with the newer version). > Anyway, I started working on this. Great! Kris --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF+G8HWry0BWjoQKURAhOxAJwKrLqoKBpH0QMxeWndkQBOKhJQKQCePGG4 BA+GD7bmsyNQj74J+nd3bRI= =mOvb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070314215415.GA52663>