From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu May 11 06:30:07 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA00169
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 11 May 1995 06:30:07 -0700
Received: from sass165.sandia.gov (sass165.sandia.gov [132.175.109.1])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA00161
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 May 1995 06:30:06 -0700
Received: from sargon.mdl.sandia.gov (sargon.mdl.sandia.gov [134.253.20.128]) by sass165.sandia.gov (8.6.11/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA03536 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 May 1995 07:32:39 -0600
Received: (aflundi@localhost) by sargon.mdl.sandia.gov (8.6.10) id HAA19188 for hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 1995 07:26:36 -0600
Message-Id: <199505111326.HAA19188@sargon.mdl.sandia.gov>
From: aflundi@sandia.gov (Alan F Lundin)
Date: Thu, 11 May 1995 07:26:36 -0600
In-Reply-To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
       "Re: question on sun cds" (May 10, 10:13pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.4 2/2/92)
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: question on sun cds
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On May 10, 10:13pm, Warner Losh wrote:
> Subject: Re: question on sun cds
>
> : The big buggaboo is the volume label and directory entry structure
> : differences that SunOS has.  The zeroed inode number as a tag for an
> : empty file system block is "different" in the directory entries
> : themselves.
> 
> Where might I find out about these differences?
> 
> : If you were trying to write a FS for a Solaris box instead, that'd be
> : a much bigger pain (it'd have to be kernel preeemption safe and Sun
> : did it the wrong way, IMO).
> 
> Since I don't need to worry about writing to a cd with the setup I
> have, I can punt on this :-).

Doesn't Sun just use the High Sierra CDROM format?

	(# mount -rt hsfs /dev/sr0 /cdrom)

--alan